What is El Condor Latin Fusion's health inspection score?

El Condor Latin Fusion has a SafeDine safety score of 81 out of 100 (Grade B). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was El Condor Latin Fusion last inspected?

El Condor Latin Fusion was last inspected on April 20, 2026. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does El Condor Latin Fusion have?

El Condor Latin Fusion has 21 total violations across 3 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is El Condor Latin Fusion safe to eat at?

El Condor Latin Fusion has a good safety record with a score of 81/100. While there are some noted violations, overall compliance is solid.

What type of cuisine does El Condor Latin Fusion serve?

El Condor Latin Fusion serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

El Condor Latin Fusion

Name: El Condor Latin Fusion
Address: 250 TATE AVENUE, Buchanan, 10511
Rating: 81

250 TATE AVENUE, Buchanan

Last Inspected: 4/20/2026

▲Improving

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Good

American

Better than 22% of american restaurants

Improving

4 inspections

Last: Apr 20, 2026

high confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

5.3

Avg Violations

2 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Cross-contaminationHigh Priority

Raw and cooked foods not properly separated

Handwashing

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Sanitation

Equipment or surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitized

Pest issues

Evidence of pests found during inspection

Food labelingHigh Priority

Food not properly labeled or dated

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-16

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-0 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-0 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-5 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Inspection Timeline

+15 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

Real-time Score: 84/100 — This score includes today's freshness penalty and may differ slightly from the displayed score (81/100) which is computed during our regular data sync.

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

250 TATE AVENUE, Buchanan, FL 10511

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Jan 2026

1 inspections

2 high priority

7 basic

Jan

Feb 2026

1 inspections

1 high priority

6 basic

Mar 2026

1 inspections

1 high priority

2 basic

Mar

Apr 2026

1 inspections

2 basic

Inspection History

4 records on file

4 Re-Inspection

Apr 26

Re-Inspection InspectionLatest

2 Basic

2 total

96/100inspection score

−4 pts

Basic (2)

−4 pts

10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−4 pts

Mar 26

Re-Inspection Inspection

1 High2 Basic

3 total1 risk factor

81/100inspection score

−14 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

1FShellfish not from approved sources, improperly tagged/labeled, tags not retained 90 days.Risk Factor−10

Basic (2)

−4 pts

10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−14 pts

Risk factor bonus (1× +5)−5 pts

Feb 26

Re-Inspection Inspection

1 High6 Basic

7 total1 risk factor

73/100inspection score

−22 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

1FShellfish not from approved sources, improperly tagged/labeled, tags not retained 90 days.Risk Factor−10

Basic (6)

−12 pts

16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2
11BWiping cloths dirty, not stored properly in sanitizing solutions−2
10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
12EHandwashing facilities inaccessible, improperly located, dirty, in disrepair, improper fixtures, soap, and single service towels or hand drying devices missing−2
11AManual facilities inadequate, technique incorrect; mechanical facilities not operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−22 pts

Risk factor bonus (1× +5)−5 pts

Jan 26

Re-Inspection Inspection

2 High7 Basic

9 total

66/100inspection score

−34 pts

High Priority (2)

−20 pts

1FShellfish not from approved sources, improperly tagged/labeled, tags not retained 90 days.−10
2CCooked or prepared foods are subject to cross-contamination from raw foods.−10

Basic (7)

−14 pts

11AManual facilities inadequate, technique incorrect; mechanical facilities not operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2
11BWiping cloths dirty, not stored properly in sanitizing solutions−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
12EHandwashing facilities inaccessible, improperly located, dirty, in disrepair, improper fixtures, soap, and single service towels or hand drying devices missing−2
12DToilet facilities inadequate, inconvenient, dirty, in disrepair, toilet paper missing, not self-closing doors, missing hand wash signs−2

Base deductions−34 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

American Restaurants All New York Restaurants