What is La Frontera Deli's health inspection score?

La Frontera Deli has a SafeDine safety score of 88 out of 100 (Grade A). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was La Frontera Deli last inspected?

La Frontera Deli was last inspected on October 6, 2025. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does La Frontera Deli have?

La Frontera Deli has 26 total violations across 4 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is La Frontera Deli safe to eat at?

Yes, La Frontera Deli has an excellent safety record with a score of 88/100. This indicates strong compliance with health and safety standards.

What type of cuisine does La Frontera Deli serve?

La Frontera Deli serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

La Frontera Deli

Name: La Frontera Deli
Address: 62 NICHOLS COURT, Hempstead, 11550
Rating: 88

62 NICHOLS COURT, Hempstead

Last inspected 8mo ago

▲Improving

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Excellent

American

Better than 22% of american restaurants

Improving

4 inspections

Last: Oct 6, 2025

medium confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

6.5

Avg Violations

8 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Cross-contamination

Raw and cooked foods not properly separated

Temperature controlHigh Priority

Food not kept at safe temperatures — risk of bacterial growth

Unsafe food sourceHigh Priority

Food obtained from unapproved or unsafe source

Handwashing

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Plumbing issues

Plumbing or waste disposal problems

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-15

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-6 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-0 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-5 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Freshness Penalty

-3 pts

Score reduced due to stale inspection data

Inspection Timeline

+12 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

Real-time Score: 85/100 — This score includes today's freshness penalty and may differ slightly from the displayed score (88/100) which is computed during our regular data sync.

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

62 NICHOLS COURT, Hempstead, FL 11550

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Aug 2024

1 inspections

3 high priority

12 basic

Aug

Sep 2024

1 inspections

1 high priority

5 basic

Sep 2025

1 inspections

1 high priority

3 basic

Sep

Oct 2025

1 inspections

1 basic

Inspection History

4 records on file

2 Re-Inspection2 Inspection

Oct 25

Re-Inspection InspectionLatest

1 Basic

1 total

98/100inspection score

−2 pts

Basic (1)

−2 pts

13BGarbage storage areas not properly constructed or maintained, creating a nuisance−2

Base deductions−2 pts

Sep 25

Inspection Inspection

1 High3 Basic

4 total

84/100inspection score

−16 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

5CPotentially hazardous foods are not stored under refrigeration except during necessary preparation or approved precooling procedures (room temperature storage).−10

Basic (3)

−6 pts

13BGarbage storage areas not properly constructed or maintained, creating a nuisance−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−16 pts

Sep 24

Re-Inspection Inspection

1 High5 Basic

6 total

80/100inspection score

−20 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

1BWater/ice: unsafe, unapproved sources, cross connections−10

Basic (5)

−10 pts

12CPlumbing and sinks not properly sized, installed, maintained; equipment and floors not properly drained−2
15AFloors, walls, ceilings, not smooth, properly constructed, in disrepair, dirty surfaces−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
8FImproper thawing procedures used−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2

Base deductions−20 pts

Aug 24

Inspection Inspection

3 High12 Basic

15 total

46/100inspection score

−54 pts

High Priority (3)

−30 pts

1BWater/ice: unsafe, unapproved sources, cross connections−10
5CPotentially hazardous foods are not stored under refrigeration except during necessary preparation or approved precooling procedures (room temperature storage).−10
5EEnough refrigerated storage equipment is not present, properly designed, maintained or operated so that all potentially hazardous foods are cooled properly and stored below 45�F as required.−10

Basic (12)

−24 pts

13BGarbage storage areas not properly constructed or maintained, creating a nuisance−2
12CPlumbing and sinks not properly sized, installed, maintained; equipment and floors not properly drained−2
8FImproper thawing procedures used−2
14CPesticide application not supervised by a certified applicator−2
12EHandwashing facilities inaccessible, improperly located, dirty, in disrepair, improper fixtures, soap, and single service towels or hand drying devices missing−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2
15AFloors, walls, ceilings, not smooth, properly constructed, in disrepair, dirty surfaces−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
11DNon food contact surfaces of equipment not clean−2
10AFood (ice) contact surfaces are improperly designed, constructed, installed, located (cracks, open seams, pitted surfaces, tin cans reused, uncleanable or corroded food contact surfaces)−2
15CPremises littered, unnecessary equipment and article present, living quarters no completely separated for food service operations, live animals, birds and pets not excluded−2
12DToilet facilities inadequate, inconvenient, dirty, in disrepair, toilet paper missing, not self-closing doors, missing hand wash signs−2

Base deductions−54 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

American Restaurants All New York Restaurants