What is Limoncello at the Orange Inn's health inspection score?

Limoncello at the Orange Inn has a SafeDine safety score of 95 out of 100 (Grade A). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was Limoncello at the Orange Inn last inspected?

Limoncello at the Orange Inn was last inspected on February 10, 2026. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does Limoncello at the Orange Inn have?

Limoncello at the Orange Inn has 18 total violations across 9 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is Limoncello at the Orange Inn safe to eat at?

Yes, Limoncello at the Orange Inn has an excellent safety record with a score of 95/100. This indicates strong compliance with health and safety standards.

What type of cuisine does Limoncello at the Orange Inn serve?

Limoncello at the Orange Inn serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

Limoncello at the Orange Inn

Name: Limoncello at the Orange Inn
Address: 159-167 MAIN STREET, Goshen, 10924
Rating: 95

159-167 MAIN STREET, Goshen

Last Inspected: 2/10/2026

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Excellent

American

Better than 22% of american restaurants

Stable

8 inspections

Last: Feb 10, 2026

high confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

25%

Clean Rate

2.3

Avg Violations

4 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Cross-contaminationHigh Priority

Raw and cooked foods not properly separated

Sanitation

Equipment or surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitized

Other violationHigh Priority

Regulatory compliance issue

Facility condition

Building maintenance or structural issues

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-7

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-4 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-0 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-2 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Inspection Timeline

+3 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

100

3rd

30% weight

Real-time Score: 93/100 — This score includes today's freshness penalty and may differ slightly from the displayed score (95/100) which is computed during our regular data sync.

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

159-167 MAIN STREET, Goshen, FL 10924

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Oct 2023

2 inspections

2 high priority

4 basic

Oct

Jan 2024

1 inspections

3 basic

Apr 2025

1 inspections

1 high priority

3 basic

Apr

May 2025

1 inspections

1 basic

Oct 2025

1 inspections

Oct

Jan 2026

1 inspections

1 high priority

2 basic

Feb 2026

1 inspections

1 basic

Feb

Inspection History

8 records on file

3 Re-Inspection5 Inspection

Feb 26

Re-Inspection InspectionLatest

1 Basic

1 total

98/100inspection score

−2 pts

Basic (1)

−2 pts

8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−2 pts

Jan 26

Inspection Inspection

1 High2 Basic

3 total

86/100inspection score

−14 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

1GCracked/dirty fresh eggs, liquid or frozen eggs and powdered eggs not pasteurized.−10

Basic (2)

−4 pts

8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
15AFloors, walls, ceilings, not smooth, properly constructed, in disrepair, dirty surfaces−2

Base deductions−14 pts

Oct 25

Inspection InspectionClean

No violations

100/100inspection score

May 25

Re-Inspection Inspection

1 Basic

1 total

98/100inspection score

−2 pts

Basic (1)

−2 pts

8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−2 pts

Apr 25

Inspection Inspection

1 High3 Basic

4 total

84/100inspection score

−16 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

4AToxic chemicals are improperly labeled, stored or used so that contamination of food can occur.−10

Basic (3)

−6 pts

8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
8FImproper thawing procedures used−2
10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2

Base deductions−16 pts

Jan 24

Inspection Inspection

3 Basic

3 total

94/100inspection score

−6 pts

Basic (3)

−6 pts

8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
15AFloors, walls, ceilings, not smooth, properly constructed, in disrepair, dirty surfaces−2
8CImproper use and storage of clean, sanitized equipment and utensils−2

Base deductions−6 pts

Oct 23

Re-Inspection InspectionClean

No violations

100/100inspection score

Oct 23

Inspection Inspection

2 High4 Basic

6 total

72/100inspection score

−28 pts

High Priority (2)

−20 pts

4AToxic chemicals are improperly labeled, stored or used so that contamination of food can occur.−10
1FShellfish not from approved sources, improperly tagged/labeled, tags not retained 90 days.−10

Basic (4)

−8 pts

8BIn use food dispensing utensils improperly stored−2
8DSingle service items reused, improperly stored, dispensed, not used when required−2
14AInsects, rodents present−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2

Base deductions−28 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

American Restaurants All New York Restaurants