What is "camp W Steak & Lemonade"'s health inspection score?

"camp W Steak & Lemonade" has a SafeDine safety score of 55 out of 100 (Grade C). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was "camp W Steak & Lemonade" last inspected?

"camp W Steak & Lemonade" was last inspected on January 4, 2024. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does "camp W Steak & Lemonade" have?

"camp W Steak & Lemonade" has 17 total violations across 3 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is "camp W Steak & Lemonade" safe to eat at?

"camp W Steak & Lemonade" has a safety score of 55/100, which suggests room for improvement. Review the detailed inspection history on SafeDine for more information.

What type of cuisine does "camp W Steak & Lemonade" serve?

"camp W Steak & Lemonade" serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

"camp W Steak & Lemonade"

Name: "camp W Steak & Lemonade"
Address: 1335 HOPPLE ST, Cincinnati, 45225
Rating: 55

1335 HOPPLE ST, Cincinnati

Data may be outdated — inspected 1/4/2024

▲Improving

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Fair

American•CAMP WASHINGTON

Ranked #20 of 25 in CAMP WASHINGTONBetter than 22% of american restaurants

Improving

3 inspections

Last: Jan 4, 2024

low confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

5.7

Avg Violations

30 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Handwashing

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Employee hygiene

Personal hygiene practices not followed

Pest issues

Evidence of pests found during inspection

Other violation

Regulatory compliance issue

Facility condition

Building maintenance or structural issues

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-45

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-5 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-2 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-8 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Freshness Penalty

-25 pts

Score reduced due to stale inspection data

Inspection Timeline

+16 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

1335 HOPPLE ST, Cincinnati, FL 45225

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Aug 2023

1 inspections

1 high priority

1 intermediate

5 basic

Aug

Sep 2023

1 inspections

1 high priority

1 intermediate

4 basic

Jan 2024

1 inspections

4 basic

Jan

Inspection History

3 records on file

3 Routine

Jan 24

Routine InspectionLatest

4 Basic

4 total

92/100inspection score

−8 pts

Basic (4)

−8 pts

3717-1-06.4(F)"3717-1-06.4(F) - Violation - Facilities: Mops: Drying After use, mops are not placed in a position that allows them to air-dry without soiling walls, equipment, or supplies."−2
3717-1-06.4(F)"3717-1-06.4(F) - Violation - Facilities: Mops: Drying After use, mops are not placed in a position that allows them to air-dry without soiling walls, equipment, or supplies."−2
3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2
3717-1-06.1(M)(3)"3717-1-06.1(M)(3) - Violation - Facilities-windows, doors protected Windows or doors were not protected against insects and rodents."−2

Base deductions−8 pts

Sep 23

Routine Inspection

1 High1 Med4 Basic

6 total

77/100inspection score

−23 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

3717-1-03.4(G)(4)"3717-1-03.4(G)(4) - Violation - RTE TCS, date marking Date marking was not done in a consistent manner according to the code."−10

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

3717-1-04.5(A)(1)"3717-1-04.5(A)(1)(2) - Violation - Equipment cleanliness-food contact Food-contact surfaces were dirty."−5

Basic (4)

−8 pts

3717-1-02.3(C)"3717-1-02.3(C) - Violation - Hair restraints, effectiveness Food employee(s) did not have their hair effectively restrained."−2
3717-1-06.2(C)"3717-1-06.2(C) - Violation - Facilities-hand drying provision Handwashing lavatory had no, unapproved, or inoperable hand drying provision."−2
3717-1-20 (B)"3717-1-20.0(B) - Violation - Replacement of existing facilities and equipment Existing equipment/facilities constitute a public health hazard and must be replaced."−2
3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2

Base deductions−23 pts

Aug 23

Routine Inspection

1 High1 Med5 Basic

7 total

75/100inspection score

−25 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

3717-1-03.4(G)(4)"3717-1-03.4(G)(4) - Violation - RTE TCS, date marking Date marking was not done in a consistent manner according to the code."−10

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

3717-1-04.5(A)(1)"3717-1-04.5(A)(1)(2) - Violation - Equipment cleanliness-food contact Food-contact surfaces were dirty."−5

Basic (5)

−10 pts

3717-1-20 (B)"3717-1-20.0(B) - Violation - Replacement of existing facilities and equipment Existing equipment/facilities constitute a public health hazard and must be replaced."−2
3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2
3717-1-02.3(C)"3717-1-02.3(C) - Violation - Hair restraints, effectiveness Food employee(s) did not have their hair effectively restrained."−2
3717-1-06.2(C)"3717-1-06.2(C) - Violation - Facilities-hand drying provision Handwashing lavatory had no, unapproved, or inoperable hand drying provision."−2
3717-1-06.2(C)"3717-1-06.2(C) - Violation - Facilities-hand drying provision Handwashing lavatory had no, unapproved, or inoperable hand drying provision."−2

Base deductions−25 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

Restaurants in Cincinnati American Restaurants Best in Cincinnati All Ohio Restaurants