What is "bruegger's Bagels #3851"'s health inspection score?

"bruegger's Bagels #3851" has a SafeDine safety score of 47 out of 100 (Grade C). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was "bruegger's Bagels #3851" last inspected?

"bruegger's Bagels #3851" was last inspected on January 9, 2024. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does "bruegger's Bagels #3851" have?

"bruegger's Bagels #3851" has 22 total violations across 3 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is "bruegger's Bagels #3851" safe to eat at?

"bruegger's Bagels #3851" has a safety score of 47/100, which suggests room for improvement. Review the detailed inspection history on SafeDine for more information.

What type of cuisine does "bruegger's Bagels #3851" serve?

"bruegger's Bagels #3851" serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

"bruegger's Bagels #3851"

Name: "bruegger's Bagels #3851"
Address: 3515 COLUMBIA PKWY, Cincinnati, 45226
Rating: 47

3515 COLUMBIA PKWY, Cincinnati

Data may be outdated — inspected 1/9/2024

▲Improving

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Poor

American•EAST END

Ranked #22 of 27 in EAST ENDBetter than 22% of american restaurants

Improving

3 inspections

Last: Jan 9, 2024

low confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

7.3

Avg Violations

30 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Temperature controlHigh Priority

Food not kept at safe temperatures — risk of bacterial growth

Handwashing

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Employee illness

Sick employee handling food — illness transmission risk

Plumbing issues

Plumbing or waste disposal problems

Employee hygiene

Personal hygiene practices not followed

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-53

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-6 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-8 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-8 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Freshness Penalty

-25 pts

Score reduced due to stale inspection data

Inspection Timeline

+21 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

3515 COLUMBIA PKWY, Cincinnati, FL 45226

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Aug 2023

2 inspections

3 high priority

2 intermediate

13 basic

Aug

Jan 2024

1 inspections

2 intermediate

2 basic

Inspection History

3 records on file

3 Routine

Jan 24

Routine InspectionLatest

2 Med2 Basic

4 total

86/100inspection score

−14 pts

Intermediate (2)

−10 pts

3717-1-04.5(A)(1)"3717-1-04.5(A)(1)(2) - Violation - Equipment cleanliness-food contact Food-contact surfaces were dirty."−5
3717-1-04.5(A)(1)"3717-1-04.5(A)(1)(2) - Violation - Equipment cleanliness-food contact Food-contact surfaces were dirty."−5

Basic (2)

−4 pts

3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2
3701-21-03"3701-21-03 - Violation - Approval of Facility Layout and Equipment Specifications Facility constructed, remodeled, or equipment installed without prior written approval from the licensor."−2

Base deductions−14 pts

Aug 23

Routine Inspection

1 High1 Med5 Basic

7 total

75/100inspection score

−25 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b)"3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b) - Violation - TCS-cold holding TCS foods were being held at temperatures >41° F."−10

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

3717-1-04.2(A)"3717-1-04.2(A) - Violation - Equipment-Cooling, Heating, and Holding Capacities There is not adequate equipment for cooling, heating or holding food. "−5

Basic (5)

−10 pts

3717-1-06.2(H)"3717-1-06.2(H) - Violation - Facilities-toilet tissue availability A supply of toilet tissue was not available at each toilet."−2
3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2
3717-1-02.3(C)"3717-1-02.3(C) - Violation - Hair restraints, effectiveness Food employee(s) did not have their hair effectively restrained."−2
3717-1-02.2(C)"3717-1-02.2(C) - Violation - Hands and arms-when to wash (handwashing) Food employee(s) did not wash hands in situations that specifically require them to do so."−2
3717-1-02.4(C)(17)"3717-1-02.4(C)(17) - Violation - PIC Duties -response plan for vomiting/diarrhea No/inadequate written procedures for response to vomiting/diarrheal events."−2

Base deductions−25 pts

Aug 23

Routine Inspection

2 High1 Med8 Basic

11 total

59/100inspection score

−41 pts

High Priority (2)

−20 pts

3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b)"3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b) - Violation - TCS-cold holding TCS foods were being held at temperatures >41° F."−10
3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b)"3717-1-03.4(F)(1)(b) - Violation - TCS-cold holding TCS foods were being held at temperatures >41° F."−10

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

3717-1-04.2(A)"3717-1-04.2(A) - Violation - Equipment-Cooling, Heating, and Holding Capacities There is not adequate equipment for cooling, heating or holding food. "−5

Basic (8)

−16 pts

3717-1-06.2(H)"3717-1-06.2(H) - Violation - Facilities-toilet tissue availability A supply of toilet tissue was not available at each toilet."−2
3717-1-06.2(H)"3717-1-06.2(H) - Violation - Facilities-toilet tissue availability A supply of toilet tissue was not available at each toilet."−2
3717-1-02.3(C)"3717-1-02.3(C) - Violation - Hair restraints, effectiveness Food employee(s) did not have their hair effectively restrained."−2
3717-1-02.2(C)"3717-1-02.2(C) - Violation - Hands and arms-when to wash (handwashing) Food employee(s) did not wash hands in situations that specifically require them to do so."−2
3717-1-06.4(B)(1)"3717-1-06.4(B)(1) - Violation - Facilities: Cleaning: Frequency The physical facilities are not cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean."−2
3717-1-02.4(C)(17)"3717-1-02.4(C)(17) - Violation - PIC Duties -response plan for vomiting/diarrhea No/inadequate written procedures for response to vomiting/diarrheal events."−2
3717-1-02.4(C)(17)"3717-1-02.4(C)(17) - Violation - PIC Duties -response plan for vomiting/diarrhea No/inadequate written procedures for response to vomiting/diarrheal events."−2
3717-1-02.2(C)"3717-1-02.2(C) - Violation - Hands and arms-when to wash (handwashing) Food employee(s) did not wash hands in situations that specifically require them to do so."−2

Base deductions−41 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

Restaurants in Cincinnati American Restaurants Best in Cincinnati All Ohio Restaurants